Monday, February 28, 2011
7/7 Bombings: Goverment refuse public enquiry...
ATS: On that the day, the four men traveled to London via a train from Luton. Metropolitan Police confirmed that they took the 0740 Thameslink train from Luton to Kings Cross on the morning of July 7th. However, The July Seventh Truth Campaign has called this "the impossible train journey". What do you mean by that?
"The impossible train journey," means precisely that, an impossible train journey. Any credible theory about what happened on 7th July 2005 requires facts upon which it should be based, yet the official government account of events places the accused on a 7.40am Luton to King's Cross Thameslink train which, categorically, was cancelled and did not run that day. This might seem like a minor detail, but if the government, with all the 'intelligence' and 'security' resources it has at its disposal, cannot obtain and report such a basic and easy to verify fact correctly, how much faith can anyone place in the rest of their story?
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread262197/pg1
"The impossible train journey," means precisely that, an impossible train journey. Any credible theory about what happened on 7th July 2005 requires facts upon which it should be based, yet the official government account of events places the accused on a 7.40am Luton to King's Cross Thameslink train which, categorically, was cancelled and did not run that day. This might seem like a minor detail, but if the government, with all the 'intelligence' and 'security' resources it has at its disposal, cannot obtain and report such a basic and easy to verify fact correctly, how much faith can anyone place in the rest of their story?
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread262197/pg1
7/7 London bombings: Dossier.
About the Dossier's Author, David Minahan
David writes:
"I was by occupation a claims investigator for an insurance company and later a leading firm of solicitors so I have some experience of "forensic" matters. I was also some years ago the National President of a major Trade Union (MSF now merged with the AEEU to form Amicus).I am convinced that there has been a massive cover up and campaign of disinformation about this matter."
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/J7-london-bombings-dossier/index.html
777 London bombers, were on a train that did not run !!!!!!
According to Sir Ian Blair, July 7th was the start of the 'largest criminal inquiry in English history' yet, to date, the police and media versions of events rely on stories that have the alleged suicide bombers catching a train from Luton that:
a) Was cancelled and did not run on July 7th, or
b) A train that arrived in London too late to catch the affected Underground trains.
Why is any of this important?
Quite simply, it means that the original police story of what happened on July 7th has the alleged suicide bombers on a train to London that did not run.
Are the British Police so incompetent that they wouldn't think to verify whether or not the train ran that they were alleging the alleged suicide bombers caught?
Or, alternatively, if the police story places the alleged bombers on a train that did not run then perhaps we should assume that all the stories about these four young men are as credible as the one that has them catching a train that didn't run?
Alternatively, there's the media story of how the alleged bombers rode from Luton to London on a train that arrived too late for them to catch the affected Underground trains as they left King's Cross.
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-london-77-how-to-be-good-faq.html
7/7 London Bombings, the Goverment still not telling what really happened...
http://www.julyseventh.co.uk/j7-latest-news-archive.html
Peter Power on the Canadian Broadcasting Service
In the days after 7th July, rather than face questioning about his role, in conjunction with a 'company of over a thousand people' on the day that 56 were killed on London transport, Power flew to Toronto for the 15th World Conference on Disaster Management.
Power appeared on a discussion panel for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's news discussion programme CBS Sunday news in which the host remarked upon the 'extraordinary' coincidence of Power's rehearsal scenario:
Evan Solomon: We've heard something quite extraordinary - could be a coincidence or not - that your firm, on the very day that the bombs went off in London, were running an exercise simulating three bombs going off, in the very same tube stations that they went off. How did this happen? Coincidence, or were you acting on information that you knew?
Peter Power: I don't think you could say that we had some special insight into the terrorist network, otherwise I would be under arrest myself. The truth of it is -
Solomon: But it is a coincidence.
Power: It's a coincidence, and it's a spooky coincidence. Our scenario was very similar - it wasn't totally identical, but it was based on bombs going off, to the time, the locations, all this sort of stuff. But it wasn't an accident, in the sense that London has a history of bombs, and the reason why our emergency services did so well, and prepared probably better than any other city in the world, sadly they have to be. So it wasn't exactly rocket science or totally out of the pale to come up with that scenario unusual though it be to stop the exercise and go into real time, and it worked very well, although there was a few seconds when the audience didn't realise whether it was real or not.
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: 11.02.11 Muad'Dib's Latest Bail Hearing
15.02.2011 - 15:36
The State failed to bring Muad'Dib to court again today, even after the judge last week ordered him to be brought.
The judge said that he would not grant bail to Muad'Dib without him being in court. Things were quickly adjourned, indefinitely at this point.
Are we really to believe that "her majesty's"prisons don't obey the orders of "her majesty's" courts and that her judges are powerless to enforce their own orders?
THEY* are fighting to keep Muad'Dib in prison, claiming it is to make sure he is in court for trial, when THEY themselves now have a 33% success-rate in having him in court, whereas he maintained a 100% perfect attendance and signing-on record when on bail for nearly two years, in Ireland.
It's not only desperate on the part of the British authorities, but further proof of the corruption, which goes all the way to the top.
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: 'Muad Dibs' arraignment
TUESDAY 18.01.11 - Muad'Dib questioned the court's jurisdiction at His Arraignment at 10 AM at Southwark Crown Court.
The court did not reveal at what time the hearing would be until today (17.01.11).
Anthony John Hill/Muad'Dib's Arraignment/Plea Hearing
18 January 2011, London England
The hearing today took place as scheduled at 10 AM in Court 10 of the Southwark Crown court. For the first time since he was extradited to the U.K. on 20 November 2010, John Hill/Muad'Dib was allowed to attend one of his hearings.
The court was expecting a plea to be entered. Instead John Hill questioned the court's jurisdiction in this matter, and will be representing himself for the preliminary argument concerning jurisdiction. A trial date of the 9th of May 2011 was set. John Hill has requested the preliminary jurisdictional argument be decided by a jury, because no judge could be impartial in this matter, which is presenting a dilemma for the court.
The preliminary jurisdictional argument will be heard beginning on the 9th May 2011 and, depending upon the outcome, the trial on the actual charge will proceed if necessary.
The Crown response to the preliminary jurisdictional argument is due in 28 days, which is also when the Defence witness list and bail application are to be submitted. A new bail application will need to be made. The judge hearing the bail application will make a ruling on the bail application in relation to the jurisdiction argument. The court has thus far denied bail.
The judge has also allotted 14 days for the Crown to decide if any further allegations are to be made. The Defence case statements will be due 28 days after that.
John Hill has already been imprisoned for over 100 days for posting DVDs of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the Kingston court during the original trial of the 3 supposed 7/7 "helpers", who were subsequently found not guilty.
The DVDs were sent as an Amicus Curiae (Friend of the court) brief to correct misleading statements made to the jurors at the outset of the trial by both Justice Gross and QC barrister Neil Flewitt.
The court did not reveal at what time the hearing would be until today (17.01.11).
Anthony John Hill/Muad'Dib's Arraignment/Plea Hearing
18 January 2011, London England
The hearing today took place as scheduled at 10 AM in Court 10 of the Southwark Crown court. For the first time since he was extradited to the U.K. on 20 November 2010, John Hill/Muad'Dib was allowed to attend one of his hearings.
The court was expecting a plea to be entered. Instead John Hill questioned the court's jurisdiction in this matter, and will be representing himself for the preliminary argument concerning jurisdiction. A trial date of the 9th of May 2011 was set. John Hill has requested the preliminary jurisdictional argument be decided by a jury, because no judge could be impartial in this matter, which is presenting a dilemma for the court.
The preliminary jurisdictional argument will be heard beginning on the 9th May 2011 and, depending upon the outcome, the trial on the actual charge will proceed if necessary.
The Crown response to the preliminary jurisdictional argument is due in 28 days, which is also when the Defence witness list and bail application are to be submitted. A new bail application will need to be made. The judge hearing the bail application will make a ruling on the bail application in relation to the jurisdiction argument. The court has thus far denied bail.
The judge has also allotted 14 days for the Crown to decide if any further allegations are to be made. The Defence case statements will be due 28 days after that.
John Hill has already been imprisoned for over 100 days for posting DVDs of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the Kingston court during the original trial of the 3 supposed 7/7 "helpers", who were subsequently found not guilty.
The DVDs were sent as an Amicus Curiae (Friend of the court) brief to correct misleading statements made to the jurors at the outset of the trial by both Justice Gross and QC barrister Neil Flewitt.
http://mtrial.org/node/106
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: Bail for Assange but not for 'Muad Dib'
This just in - Muad'Dib has today been denied bail, shortly after Julian Assange's bail was granted.
Before the bail-hearing, the courtroom was cleared of all members of the public and anyone else that was not "legally" participating in the case. This is something known as having a hearing “in chambers”, though, in practice, people don't actually go to the judge’s chambers. The courtroom is cleared of anyone the judge doesn't want there instead.
http://mtrial.org/node/97
Before the bail-hearing, the courtroom was cleared of all members of the public and anyone else that was not "legally" participating in the case. This is something known as having a hearing “in chambers”, though, in practice, people don't actually go to the judge’s chambers. The courtroom is cleared of anyone the judge doesn't want there instead.
So, no friends of Muad'Dib were able to be in the courtroom and witness first-hand what actually occurred and they were only informed after the court-hearing by a lawyer in the hallway.
Based upon what was reported back by the lawyer present, the judge’s main issue was that Muad'Dib would “re-offend” by contacting other people while on bail.
Based upon what was reported back by the lawyer present, the judge’s main issue was that Muad'Dib would “re-offend” by contacting other people while on bail.
The judge made specific note of the 7/7 inquest going on (which is a show "trial" where the criminals "investigate" themselves).
There was apparently other things shared in court which could have been easily responded to by any of us that know what is really going on out in the world, but that is probably why the judge kicked everyone who knew anything about Muad'Dib and his situation out of the courtroom.
The lone lawyer handling the case, who has never even spoken with Muad'Dib, nevermind knows anything about him, was therefore ill-equipped to handle the situation. The fact that Muad'Dib had already been out on bail for about a year and a half and had not "re-offended" made no difference to the judge. Logic and sensibility are not aspects of modern-day British "justice".
Muad'Dib will now be held in prison through the New Year and into at least the middle of January when his FIRST chance to actually deal with this case will occur, about 50 days after he had been extradited. He will have had to wait about 50 days in jail just to go to court to tell them he's innocent and then some. Incredible.
Yes, about 50 days for Muad'Dib to even get his first real day in court after the so-called authorities have pulled every trick they can to keep an innocent and Just Man imprisoned for speaking the Truth.
We are still hoping to make another bail application at Muad'Dib's first hearing in court, and most likely will need to include more money to put in the judge's account to satisfy him. The small sum of 1,500GBP we were able to gather for the initial bail hearing just didn't cut it. So, if anyone out there is able, any donations for Muad'Dib's bail fund would be incredibly appreciated and a link can be found on this website where to donate. Even if we can get up to 2,000GBP, that would hopefully help alongside other efforts.
http://mtrial.org/node/97
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: Visiting Muad'Dib' in prison
created 16.12.2010 - 10:36, updated 18.12.2010 - 09:15
By Nick Kollerstrom
Terroronthetube.co.uk
6th December
In the gloomy depths of Wandsworth jail, I met a remarkable British visionary.
Anthony John Hill
has named himself ‘Muad’Dib’ after the teacher-figure in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi classic Dune.
He is the author of what is by far the most influential of 7/7 videos, The Ripple Effect.
It was wonderful to meet him, and a rare pleasure to have a chat with someone so deeply versed in the whole 7/7 issue. I brought him some mince pies, but wasn’t allowed to give them to him. But, I was allowed to give him a book, and gave him The Cabbala of Power by Israel Shamir. That would keep him busy, I figured, through the long, lonely hours.
He’d been there about a week, after losing his case against extradition in Dublin’s supreme court. His defence had accused the British crown of being corrupt and wicked! One has to agree with Richard D. Hall that that the Crown’s case against Muad’Dib is ‘the most preposterous case you have ever heard in your entire life.’ But, Mr Hill wasn’t depressed, he assured me. He had a cheerful countenance, marvellously serene in fact, with his long, white beard. I could not recall having seen such a long, white beard that was for real.
Was he short of books to read? He had two, he explained, the Bible and the Koran.
During the week he was in jail, Muslims had gathered around him when they were allowed out of their cells each day, to listen to him talking to them about the Ripple Effect. He was then moved to a different cell, which he shares with one Muslim. He has conversations with this inmate, he told me, where he discourses on how the Koran and Bible are compatible, how they relate together.
I came away with a feeling that I had witnessed some kind of Old Testament parable, of The Just Man in Captivity. I have been much abused and vilified in public, from pursuing the topic of 7/7 truth – through which Muad’Dib supported me – but, at least I haven’t gone to jail. He is worried he may lose his home in Dublin which he keeps by means of housing benefit.
He should soon be out on bail.
But, there will come a court case he will have to attend. The specific charge in his EU Arrest Warrant was, an act intended or tending to pervert the course of justice. To pervert course of justice means something like suborning jurors or bribing judges, not sending amicus curae material, i.e. helpfully relevant information for the Court to peruse. If he gets a jury trial, the case should be laughed out of court. Or, if he gets a judge – it could mean life.
To obtain permission for this visit, I had to know his date of birth, which a friend of M.D. gave me.
A comment on the Henry Makow site by Debra Siddons is of interest. She writes,
On 16th December, Anthony John Hill goes on trial for bail. The same day, maybe the same time, Wikileaks editor Julian Assange goes for bail trial at Westminster Magistrate Court. They have both been imprisoned at the same place, namely Wandsworth jail.
He asked me, had anything on the Inquest gone against his Ripple Effect story? I opined that, possibly the testimony of the Woodall service station forecourt-manager, that at 5 am on July 7th he had seen only one other person in the car when Tanweer was buying petrol, could indicate that Khan was not with them. (In addition, tho I didn’t say this, one would have to regard several witness testimonies as false or mistaken).
Terroronthetube.co.uk
6th December
In the gloomy depths of Wandsworth jail, I met a remarkable British visionary.
Anthony John Hill
has named himself ‘Muad’Dib’ after the teacher-figure in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi classic Dune.He is the author of what is by far the most influential of 7/7 videos, The Ripple Effect.
It was wonderful to meet him, and a rare pleasure to have a chat with someone so deeply versed in the whole 7/7 issue. I brought him some mince pies, but wasn’t allowed to give them to him. But, I was allowed to give him a book, and gave him The Cabbala of Power by Israel Shamir. That would keep him busy, I figured, through the long, lonely hours.
He’d been there about a week, after losing his case against extradition in Dublin’s supreme court. His defence had accused the British crown of being corrupt and wicked! One has to agree with Richard D. Hall that that the Crown’s case against Muad’Dib is ‘the most preposterous case you have ever heard in your entire life.’ But, Mr Hill wasn’t depressed, he assured me. He had a cheerful countenance, marvellously serene in fact, with his long, white beard. I could not recall having seen such a long, white beard that was for real.
Was he short of books to read? He had two, he explained, the Bible and the Koran.
During the week he was in jail, Muslims had gathered around him when they were allowed out of their cells each day, to listen to him talking to them about the Ripple Effect. He was then moved to a different cell, which he shares with one Muslim. He has conversations with this inmate, he told me, where he discourses on how the Koran and Bible are compatible, how they relate together.
I came away with a feeling that I had witnessed some kind of Old Testament parable, of The Just Man in Captivity. I have been much abused and vilified in public, from pursuing the topic of 7/7 truth – through which Muad’Dib supported me – but, at least I haven’t gone to jail. He is worried he may lose his home in Dublin which he keeps by means of housing benefit.
He should soon be out on bail.
But, there will come a court case he will have to attend. The specific charge in his EU Arrest Warrant was, an act intended or tending to pervert the course of justice. To pervert course of justice means something like suborning jurors or bribing judges, not sending amicus curae material, i.e. helpfully relevant information for the Court to peruse. If he gets a jury trial, the case should be laughed out of court. Or, if he gets a judge – it could mean life.
To obtain permission for this visit, I had to know his date of birth, which a friend of M.D. gave me.
A comment on the Henry Makow site by Debra Siddons is of interest. She writes,
Several weeks ago, the Supreme Court of Ireland proved to everyone just how corrupt they are when they extradited A.J. Hill, also known to supporters as “Muad’Dib”, for mailing DVDs of his Film, the “7/7 Ripple Effect” to a U.K. courthouse….NOT ONE SINGLE JUDGE IN IRELAND VIEWED THE DVD BEFORE CONCLUDING THAT A.J. HILL’S INTENTIONS WARRANTED EXTRADITION. How could a court determine his Intentions without ever viewing the DVD?Wikileaks Julian Assange kept in same Jail, goes on bail trial the same day
Wake-up Fremen/Free-men. It is time to follow Muad’Dib’s Example and fight for what is right in God’s Eyes. If you won’t stand up for someone else now, who will be left to stand up for you when they come to imprison YOU for telling the truth?
On 16th December, Anthony John Hill goes on trial for bail. The same day, maybe the same time, Wikileaks editor Julian Assange goes for bail trial at Westminster Magistrate Court. They have both been imprisoned at the same place, namely Wandsworth jail.
He asked me, had anything on the Inquest gone against his Ripple Effect story? I opined that, possibly the testimony of the Woodall service station forecourt-manager, that at 5 am on July 7th he had seen only one other person in the car when Tanweer was buying petrol, could indicate that Khan was not with them. (In addition, tho I didn’t say this, one would have to regard several witness testimonies as false or mistaken).7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: Wikileaks frenzy used to cover up critical news story...
created 11.12.2010 - 01:17, updated 18.12.2010 - 06:33
London, England Dec 10, 2010:-
The million-dollar question that I think must be asked today is this: Why the Wikileaks controlled-media frenzy?
Julian Assange and his Wikileaks website are the main subject of a mainstream media blitz right now and it should be clear to everyone at this point that mainstream media only covers nonsense and side-shows, while keeping totally mum about things that should be headlines.
So, simple logic would say that Wikileaks is being used by the Hidden Hand to accomplish something(s), in an effort to advance or protect some part of their agenda.
If the Wikileaks disclosures were actually doing any damage to the NWO agenda, no one would be hearing a peep from the media. All this is easy to understand and probably everyone has gotten at least this far with their analysis of the situation.
Through extensive research, this author now believes that the following is the REAL reason for the Wikileaks frenzy, or at least a solid part of it:-
Right now Julian Assange is in London’s Wandsworth Prison. So what? But do you know who else is in that exact same prison?
Also at Wandsworth in London is John Hill (aka Muad’Dib), the man who produced the “7/7 Ripple Effect” film, which completely broke-down, and thus exposed that “terrorist attack” as the false-flag it obviously was.
John’s main website is jahtruth.net, which has been successfully exposing the British royals and other topics for years. He’s also been telling people through his offshoot website at jforjustice.co.uk how to use the truth about QE2 (she’s not the real, rightful queen of Britain—oh you didn’t know? But are you really that surprised to find out?), to get the authorities to drop charges on any/all victimless “crime”.
As the result of Mr. Hill’s decades of anti-NWO actions and personal, original, and in-depth research, he’s been monitored and outright harassed by police for a long time.
He’s also been robbed by them, as they stole all his computer equipment and even his printer in an attempt to stop him from revealing things that the crown doesn’t want people to know about. And now, he’s imprisoned for the crime of telling the Truth.
The BBC even sent someone to sit outside his home for almost a week, sitting there waiting to ambush him with a camera in order to obtain footage for the attempted character-assassination they perpetrated on him through their “Conspiracy Files” disinformation TV program. John is such a benevolent soul that their attempted character-assassination really turned into a great advertisement for his film.
Basically… after all of the above, we can be certain that he is NOT one of “them”.
There is not a shred of evidence to support that. On the other hand, several of Julian Assange’s own former Wikileaks associates are speaking out about Julian helping to cover-up evidence regarding how the US and Britain lied to get into the middle-eastern wars in the first place.
Mr. Assange would also prefer that people don’t find out about his deals with Israeli figures like Benjamin Netanyahu. Assange also has plenty of access to the media, many think too much access, and through the above, it becomes clear that he is either working for Establishment willingly, or as a dupe.
John Hill‘s battle with the fraudulent “crown” shows a totally different situation.
He has been monitored by the secret services, robbed, imprisoned, placed under a court-enforced gag-order, extradited, and is now in London being prosecuted by the “counter-terrorism” police, ALL while being completely blacklisted from access to the mainstream media reporting.
The only time the mainstream media reports on John is when they are slandering him, but they are obviously so concerned about his message getting out right now that they are not even attempting that. Only silence.
So, the Illuminazis have put these two clearly dissimilar people both in the EXACT SAME PRISON.
One of them (Julian Assange) is just the latest media-created celebrity, who, in reality, no one should really care about and no one would if he wasn’t working for the NWO-agenda.
The other (John Hill) is a man that many believe has found a way to legitimately re-take Britain back from the Bankster-Elite, in a non-violent way, through his unparalleled research on the “queen” and the true history of the British people.
This is why the media is completely silent right now.
Because they know that if enough people learned about what John is striving to show people, and got behind the effort to push the “queen” out of power, it would mean big trouble for the Establishment. Re-taking Britain would obviously provide the catalyst to start putting an end to the NWO’s plans throughout the world.
In John’s film, “7/7 Ripple Effect”, he reported that the people truly behind the 7/7 bombings in London have such sick and arrogant minds, that on the side of the double-decker bus that exploded, they arranged to have a large sign/billboard saying: “OUTRIGHT TERROR… BOLD AND BRILLIANT.”
Picture shown here:
You see? They even gave themselves 4 stars. One for each explosion that day.
These people put signs and symbols everywhere because they are extremely arrogant and love shoving what they are doing right in front of people’s faces, knowing that most can’t “see” it. But John Hill called them out on this one.
It is this writer’s point of view that these rotten, but powerful people have first imprisoned John Hill for telling the public things that are actually harmful to the NWO agenda. Then, due to their extreme arrogance and evil minds, they wanted to gloat in front of John at this point, while showing off their “power” and “control”.
So, what does the Synagogue of Satan and their controlled government and media assets do?
Even though it is quite a sizeable world, these sick people organize things so that both aforementioned men are in the exact same place, at the exact same time. They then turn what seems like every camera on planet Earth towards the unimportant person, making him the most talked about man in the world right now, while at the same time they do not report a single syllable about the extremely important facts surrounding John Hill’s research and court case—even though John is right there in the same spot.
So, inline with the billboard on the bus mentioned above, that John himself had been exposing to people through his documentary, the Illuminazis are in this way putting their same old egotistical trademarks on what is presently happening.
They’ve organized things so that throngs of global media are reporting on someone totally propped up and unimportant (Assange), while he stands right next to John, whose selfless cause and research gets absolutely no publicity at all.
Through this, they are basically giving John the metaphorical finger—and it shows how badly they hate (and fear?) John, that they’d go to such an extraordinary effort as to pull a stunt like this. Seeing as how they are doing just that, it should be an obvious sign to anyone that doesn’t yet know about the decades of research that John Hill (JAH) has compiled on his website linked above.
John’s film, “7/7 Ripple Effect”, is the product of a brilliant mind having put together bit by bit how a false-flag attack is perpetrated. This author could never have made such a masterpiece.
However, I hope through this article that I’ve done what I’m able to for people’s ability to understand this Wikileaks frenzy and distraction, by putting together bit by bit what isn’t being told to people and how the NWO’s arrogance and symbolism are at play in what’s going on. Please don’t be stupid enough to believe all this is just some “coincidence”. Everyone should know better than that by now.
Right now, the international media, on behalf of their satanic masters (“the prince of the power of the air[-waves]” – Ephesians 2:2), are attempting to thumb their noses at the person they see as the biggest immediate threat to them on planet earth.
They are flexing their muscles, acting all big and bad (or “Bold and Brilliant”), so PLEASE help turn this situation around on the media-controllers. Their actions are exceedingly arrogant and evil, so stick it to them and trip them up on this.
Now that everyone knows what the central issue is with this Wikileaks nonsense, use the situation to publicize John/JAH’s case to the maximum. PLEASE. Don’t let this proceed under the radar—for YOUR sake and mine. The British royal family is in a very vulnerable spot right now and we MUST hit them now more than ever.
Lets thumb our noses at THEM for a change. Show them we’re not as stupid as they think and we can “see” what they’re doing.
God bless you, John. From all of us.
PLEASE check out the following
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT : Posting DVDS is now a life term prison sentence...
created 07.12.2010 - 21:51, updated 18.12.2010 - 06:43
London, England, Dec 05, 2010 – In what many believe to be an extraordinary abuse of police-empowering legislation, counter-terrorism officers have pressed-forward in their plans to convict a British man of a major criminal offense, for posting DVD copies of a documentary film he produced, to the crown court in Kingston-upon-Thames.
Anthony John Hill, aged 62, also known as “Muad’Dib” the producer of the documentary film,“7/7 Ripple Effect”, has been charged with “intending to pervert the course of justice,” after counter-terrorism police investigated him for sending copies of his film to the British court, requesting the court administrators deliver them to the judge and jury-foreman in a trial related to the London Underground bombings on July 7th, 2005. This has always been common practice in Britain, as people send opinions or evidence, openly or anonymously, to courthouses all the time, acting as an “amicus curiae” (a friend of the court).
Now—posting DVDs to a court is a crime—and possibly “terrorism”… Do you feel safer? Or have things gone too far?
The film itself,“7/7 Ripple Effect”, has gained international notoriety for using official government and mainstream media reports to highlight irregularities and impossibilities in the Home Office’s official take, and then re-take, on what happened. Initially dismissed by many as “conspiracy theory”, recent testimony at the 7/7 inquest, in tandem with deeper independent investigations over the years, is increasingly proving that the film is more fact than theory—putting the government in an uncomfortable situation.
Mr. Hill believes that it is due to the take-off success of his film, and it’s irrefutable contents, that he’s now being targeted and harassed by the authorities.
This claim appears to be well-founded, as the lead counter-terrorism officer handling the case stated this past week that when Mr. Hill was initially arrested, his friends and supporters also sent DVD copies of the same film to the courthouse that he appeared before.
In other words, they did the exact same thing that Mr. Hill is now in jail for, but the officer admitted plainly that the police had no intention of even investigating those other acts, never mind prosecuting anyone.
With all the controversy stirred up by people injured in the blasts and the families of the people that died, as well as independent investigative reporting and now the plainly-admitted double-standards of the authorities in targeting someone with an “unauthorized” viewpoint, it appears that the British peoples' trust in their government is reaching its lowest levels ever and they're just not buying the “terrorism” and “national security” excuses for those in government to be able to do whatever they want.
After already having to change the official government narrative on more than one occasion, and with MI5 making every effort possible to have secret, closed-door hearings at the recent inquest, its becoming more and more clear that the Home Office and MI5 have something to hide. It seems clear at this point that Mr. Hill’s film,“7/7 Ripple Effect”, is bringing some hidden things to light.
When simple, obvious, and relevant questions are going systematically unanswered, sensible people start getting suspicious.
- The CCTV footage alone should have made it immediately and perfectly clear which train the alleged bombers took.
So, why did the government have to change its official story when independent freelance researchers, concerned that the official story didn’t add up, discovered that the first train the bombers were said to have caught was actually cancelled that day?
How would the government with all its access to different agencies have got such a basic and crucial fact wrong, and then refuse to change their story for so long?
If they got the very first part of the timeline wrong, how can we trust the rest?
WHERE’s ALL the CCTV footage and how is keeping it hidden a “matter of national security” when the authorities have already stated exactly what the footage would show? Shouldn’t the government be made to prove their claims, with evidence, like everyone else? Or are they now above the law?
-Why did multiple eyewitness reports from people actually there on 7/7 say the floors in the trains blew upwards, as if the bombs were placed below the carriages, not downwards, as would be the case if the explosions were truly the result of backpack bombs?
-Why did the BBC, Channel 5, and other mainstream news sources report within hours of the bombings that multiple bombers had been “neutralized” (killed) by armed police in the Docklands area, and why were those reports never repeated or re-discussed?
-Graphic-design veterans analyzed in detail the lone CCTV image released from 7/7, then claimed it had been badly manipulated.
Why hasn’t this been investigated at all?
Why was only one lone still-image released to begin with?
Where’s all the evidence?
These are just a few of the many basic questions that remain unanswered more than 5 years after the event. WHY?
For the latest updates on Mr. Hill’s trial and how to get involved, please visit:
mtrial.org ***WAKE UP Britain!!!***
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: Life in prison for posting DVD'
Dublin, Ireland, Nov 11, 2010 -The Supreme Court of Ireland ordered Anthony John Hill, 62, also known by supporters as "Muad'Dib" the producer of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" documentary, to be remanded back into custody pending immediate extradition from Ireland to the United Kingdom for posting copies of his film to a UK courthouse.
It is alleged that Mr. Hill "intended to pervert the course of justice" by sending copies of his documentary film, "7/7 Ripple Effect", to a UK courthouse, requesting that the court administrators deliver the DVDs to the judge and jury foreman in a case related to three men accused of helping plan the 2005 London tube-train bombings. All three men have since been found not guilty on those charges. However, as a result of posting the DVDs, Mr. Hill now faces extradition and a possible life sentence in the UK.
The documentary itself has found wide-spread support from around the world by highlighting irregularities in the government's official report of what transpired on 7/7, 2005, causing many people to question the integrity of the government's original story.
Members of the public regularly send information to courthouses either anonymously, or as an identifiable amicus curiae ("friend of the court"), when they believe they have information vital to a particular proceeding. For this reason, Mr. Hill believes that it is due to the mainstream success of his film, and the resulting embarrassment caused to the Crown by requiring them to change their official story, that he's now being unfairly and maliciously prosecuted for political reasons. Prior to the Supreme Court hearing, Mr. Hill stated, "They have absolutely no case." He has asserted that the prosecutor and judge were committing perjury and that he was striving to prevent them from perverting the course of justice. As a result of his persistent activism, the prosecution services appear to have gone out of their way to charge him with the crime he says they were committing. Mr. Hill has told friends that because he won't "play ball" with the government authorities, they are now "hitting (him) with the BAR."
His use of the word "BAR" refers to the world-wide legal fraternity, the "British Accredited Registry", of which most lawyers and judges in a number of first-world nations are members.
Supporters plan to hold rallies in a showing of solidarity with Mr. Hill's efforts, though it is currently unknown which court Mr. Hill will appear before, or when, as the extradition process is still being carried out.
"7/7 Ripple Effect" will be shown on Sky channel 201 (The Showcase Channel), and Freesat 403, on 26th November 2010 at 7:00pm.
People interested in watching the documentary for free online or attending the support rallies are encouraged to go to the following website for more details and contact information: http://www.blogger.com/mtrial.org.
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: Possible life in prison for mailing DVDS
11/11/2010 Dublin—The Irish Supreme Court ruled today to uphold the extradition of Anthony John Hill, also known as Muad'Dib, for sending DVDs of the widely popular "7/7 Ripple Effect" to the jury foreman and judge, in c/o a British courthouse.
The Irish Supreme Court's decision was to facilitate the British government's demand, through Westminster Magistrates Court, and an European Arrest Warrant, and surrender Mr. Hill to face charges for simply mailing DVDs of the "7/7 Ripple Effect” (with no letter) to the Kingston Crown Court, during the original trial of Waheed Ali, Sadeer Saleem and Mohammed Shakil. The British government had hoped to use the trial to lend credence to their "official story", which they failed to do when the 3 young men were found innocent.
About 35 to 40 supporters of Muad'Dib attended the extradition hearing at the Irish Supreme Court. The hearing was heard in a small courtroom known as the Hugh Kennedy room, rather than the primary Supreme Court room, probably to limit the publicity and room for supporters. The room was full, with about half a dozen supporters standing at the back.
The following is an account of what took place in the Irish Supreme Court. It is not a verbatim account, and has been transcribed from rough notes taken by Richard D. Hall during the trial, and added to by others, so the quotations and statements are not word for word.
The following is an account of what took place in the Irish Supreme Court. It is not a verbatim account, and has been transcribed from rough notes taken by Richard D. Hall during the trial, and added to by others, so the quotations and statements are not word for word.
Muad'Dib represented Himself in front of the panel of 3 Irish Supreme Court judges, and was immediately and rudely questioned by the presiding judge about His Written Submission. The presiding judge felt it necessary to question which aspects of Muad'Dib's Written Submission Muad'Dib would be presenting to the court, as if the other points would not be considered, even though the presiding judge claimed that everything was being considered.
Muad'Dib opened by stating that it needed to be established that neither the Irish Supreme Court, nor any other court on this prison planet, has any jurisdiction over Him, and that the ONLY Law which applies was The Law given by Moses, at Sinai, in Horeb as stated in The Bible. He held up a copy of The Bible as He made this statement to the court and the judges.
The presiding judge felt the need to then ask if that was the only point that Muad'Dib wished the court to consider or if He was planning on presenting any of the "legal" arguments from His Written Submission. The presiding judge presumably asked this question because Muad'Dib's Written Submission thoroughly covered all angles, using the Irish law and Constitution, the laws of the European Union, and also God's Law, which is recognized by the Irish Constitution and by British law as the Supreme Law, superseding all others.
Muad'Dib informed the judges that one really precluded the other, because He was The Supreme Authority and that The Law expressly forbids men from making up man-made legislation, like the legislation that was being used against Him in this case.
Muad'Dib then told the court who He really is, prompting His friends and supporters to vocalize their support for Him. An officer of the court then quickly shouted at everyone to be quiet and extra security then entered the courtroom.
Muad'Dib pointed out to the judges, that a statue of Moses resides on top of “this building” (the 4 Courts building in Dublin) and that Father and He had given Moses The Law and that it is The ONLY Law on this prison planet. Therefore all legal arguments, which are all based on fraudulent man-made legislation, are not lawful according to The Law, and this applied to the EU arrest warrant served, which had no authority.
In an effort to skirt the issue of jurisdiction, the presiding judge then stated that Muad'Dib had made legal arguments in His Submission to the court and then asked Him “Does that mean you are not going to present legal arguments to the court?” with the same attitude as before.
Muad'Dib paused to consider this, and stated the obvious, that the legal arguments were irrelevant and there was no point to it because the court had no jurisdiction over Him. The judges initially seemed baffled by this line and again asked, did that mean his legal arguments were not to be considered, proving that they had not read and studied His Written Submission.
Further proof of this came when Muad'Dib asked the judges if he had watched the DVD, to which the presiding judge replied “No the court has not”. He went on to say “The court has been asked to consider a European arrest warrant. The court will not look at the DVD for the same reason that the judge in the previous hearing did not look at it." The presiding judge then stated "we are only interested in legal argument at this hearing". The previous lower court judge (Peart) had promised to watch the DVD and then broke his promise by refusing to do so (because he was ordered/threatened not to watch it?).
Muad'Dib then replied to this “So, not lawful arguments, just legal arguments, which are legislation and are therefore unlawful”.
After being asked previously by Muad'Dib, and refusing to answer which points of His Submission the court was going to consider, the presiding judge eventually yielded that the court was considering only 3 of the numerous "legal" points (including the fact that the surrender of the Appellant is prohibited under the EAWA 2003 on the five distinct grounds) made in Muad'Dib's Written Submission. Muad'Dib began the discussion of the "legal" points by stating that the law of crime by embracery is fraudulent and reminding the court that mankind cannot legislate. He said under embracery any submission is illegal, because it can prevent the truth getting into a court.
Muad'Dib also pointed out that in the perversion of the course of justice there has to be dishonest intent, but again the presiding judge said that this hearing was not to consider evidence, but to consider the European arrest warrant.
Muad'Dib's representation at the previous high court hearing was also discussed. Muad'Dib stated that His Barrister, Mr. Kelly did not follow his instructions and didn’t present His Argument that the extradition request was malicious and politically motivated at the previous trials. The judges completely ignored this fact, as evidenced in the court's decision.
After about half an hour the 3 judges left the court to consider the case for about 20 minutes. About 1 minute before the judges returned to give their verdict, 5 Garda policy enforcers entered the court room. The presiding judge then summed up which took about 15 minutes.
He first dismissed the claim that the court had no jurisdiction over Muad'Dib, quoting that their authority over Him comes from the constitution, but the presiding judge did say that the court understood Muad'Dib's Position on this, which is impossible. He then said that they considered 3 of the numerous legal points which Muad'Dib raised in His Submission, and that he would address the 3 legal points.
The first was that the charge of perverting the course of justice was an infringement of His Freedom of expression under European law. The actual charge is “doing an act tending and intended to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law”, which the presiding judge never correctly stated, referring to the charge as "perverting the course of justice". The omission of the "intention" portion of the charge is critical, as there was obviously no intent on the part of Muad'Dib to do anything but PREVENT a miscarriage of justice, which is what prompted Him to send the DVDs. The presiding judge dismissed this stating that, while they recognize the importance of freedom of expression, it is not an absolute right and that it is "universally recognized" that restrictions have to be placed on it. He then used the example of newspaper editors writing prejudiced material while a trial is under way, that could result in the jury being discharged, which is ridiculous. The DVDs were sent IN THE CARE OF THE COURT. Newspaper articles do not use the courts as a filter for what they print during a trial. The court proceeded by rejecting the first of their three cherry-picked arguments from Muad'Dib's Written Submission under these false pretenses.
The second argument considered was that there is no such offence in Ireland as perverting the course of justice. Please pay special attention to this, for this also proves what a miscarriage of justice this hearing really was. This Supreme Court judge made it sound like Muad'Dib had stated the opposite of what was actually written in His Submission. It was, in fact, the prosecutor (Minister) in the previous High Court trial, who had stated there was no such offence in Ireland as perverting the course of justice, as part of his argument that Muad'Dib should be extradited to face trial in the U.K, instead of being tried in Ireland for the same alleged offence. The judge (Peart J) in this previous High Court trial also did nothing to correct the prosecutor (Minister).
Please read the following taken from Muad'Dib's Written Submission to the Irish Supreme Court:-
43. Peart J. erred in law by allowing the Minister to submit the statement that, from the learned judge’s legal-experience, he must have known was a lie; for which the Minister should be charged with committing perjury; and the learned judge also erred by then accepting that lie into the hearing. That false statement/lie being that there is no definition in Irish law of perverting the course of justice. Perverting the course of justice, as the Minister MUST know, is clearly defined in the Irish Criminal Justice Act, 1999,
http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1999/en/act/pub/0010/sec0041.html#partvi-sec41
Section 41. – (1) Without prejudice to any provision made by any other enactment or rule of law, a person – who harms or threatens, menaces or in any other way intimidates or puts in fear another person who is assisting in the investigation by the Garda Siochána of an offence or is a witness or potential witness or a juror or potential juror in proceedings for an offence, or a member of his or her family, with the intention thereby of causing the investigation or the course of justice to be obstructed, perverted or interfered with, shall be guilty of an offence.
44. Peart J. erred in law by then allowing the Minister to build on that lie; that there is no definition in Irish law of perverting the course of justice; to introduce into the hearing, a different offence in English law, not Irish law: stating that we have to accept the English law, in an Irish court: that of attempting to influence a judge or jury. If it is a crime to attempt to influence a judge or jury, then every barrister and solicitor is guilty of that crime, in every case.
45. Peart J. erred in law by allowing the Minister to advance this argument when it is based on a lie and it is a different offence from that with which the Appellant is charged, and now the Minister is at it again having subsequently introduced embracery (from 1360AD) and contempt of court, that appear nowhere in the EAW that is the subject of this case, as is required by law. Who is he serving?
http://mtrial.org/node/38
Muad'Dib even quotes the section from the Irish Criminal Justice Act, 1999, for their benefit. The Supreme Court judge went on to state that the law goes back 100 years (so why not try Muad'Dib in an Irish court for it?) and also stated that "it is a common law". The presiding judge delivered this ruling against Muad'Dib never realizing that he had actually misunderstood the point(?) and was ruling in favour of what Muad'Dib had actually presented in His Written Submission. And these were allegedly "learned" and "impartial" Supreme Court judges?
The presiding judge also made a slip of the tongue when discussing the DVD by stating that it was "anticipated", which later he corrected to "intercepted". He went on to say that "any approach to a jury may amount to an attempt to pervert the course of justice". The court therefore stated their rejection of the second of their three cherry-picked arguments, never realizing (or did they?) that they AGAIN misunderstood the point and had actually agreed with Muad'Dib's argument here whilst ruling against Him.
The third argument considered was that the crime was not committed in England. This was rejected on the grounds that the act of communication with the Jury took place in England, despite the fact that the DVDs were mailed from Ireland, AND despite the fact the alleged act of communication with the Jury never took place. They again used a far-fetched analogy, that it would be the same as if Muad'Dib had telephoned someone in England and asked them to do it, never taking into consideration that the DVDs were sent IN CARE OF THE COURT, for the court to forward as they saw fit, and that THE DVDs NEVER REACHED THE JURY. The court therefore rejected the third of their three cherry-picked arguments from Muad'Dib's Submission, again under false pretenses.
And that is how the "learned" Irish Supreme Court judges orchestrated upholding the extradition request.
Several shouts from the supporters could then be heard, "Traitors", "Injustice", "Cowards", "This is an outrage", "Shame", and "Look at the evidence, Servers of Satan”. Muad'Dib sat quietly on the bench for 3 or 4 minutes with a Garda policy enforcer standing over Him. He was not forced to his feet, the Garda policy enforcer could clearly see he was a very peaceful and elderly man. Muad'Dib's supporters tried to appeal to the Garda policy enforcer's common sense to reconsider what he was doing to no avail.
Muad'Dib was taken to the local Garda station first and then transferred to Cloverhill, where He had previously spent 33 days incarcerated for this matter. There is presently no update on when He will be moved from Cloverhill to the U.K. and no court date there has been set.
From what has transpired, it should be clear to anyone familiar with the case that there is absolutely NO justice in Ireland, nor was there ever an independent republic of Ireland. The Irish people are still subject to the fraudulent queen of England and the Irish judges and QC barristers are in fact traitors and nothing more than pawns carrying out their orders from the British crown. The British crown does not like being embarrassed, which is exactly what Muad'Dib/JAH has done with the "7/7 Ripple Effect" film, and why He is being made to suffer. The ludicrous nature of the charge against Muad'Dib/JAH should show everyone how desperate the British crown really is.
It is ironic that at the same time Burma was releasing the political prisoner Aung San Suu Kyi; whom Prime Minister David Cameron has called an "inspiration"; the British "crown" was making further inroads towards turning Muad'Dib into a political prisoner right here in Britain, for sending a court DVDs of the "7/7 Ripple Effect".
What the British government doesn't seem to know is that in extraditing Muad'Dib/JAH to the U.K., they will not only be increasing the popularity of the "7/7 Ripple Effect" film, they are bringing home THE evidence that Elizabeth II is a fraud. This injustice and how it unfolds should hopefully help focus people's attention on Muad'Dib/JAH and get the world to take notice of The Example that He has set, to bring the Truth, Justice, Freedom and Peace to this planet.
Friends of Muad'Dib
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Press Release-JAH Extradited-F1.doc | 46 KB |
http://mtrial.org/pressrelease/15112010
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: Extradition approved
by Jim Fetzer, 13.11.2010
http://noliesradio.org/archives/25176
In a stunning development, Ireland’s highest court ruled in favor of the extradition of Muad’Dib, who produced “7/7 Ripple Effect”, to England to stand trial for attempting to corrupt the judicial system.
The charge is in fact quite absurd, since Muad’Dib simply sent copies of his DVD to the court in England in an attempt to preclude the miscarriage of justice that would be involved in sentencing friends of the alleged “bombers” for their complicity in the matter, which is completely unjustified, once one becomes aware of the apparent governmental complicity in staging the 7/7 attacks.
The court addressed only three of some fifty-six points Muad’Dib had made in his own defense while ignoring the remainder.
According to a friend of Muad’Dib, Rob, who was present at the hearing, they used tortured logic and distorted language to justify their otherwise grossly improper verdict. The judges did not even bother to view “7/7 Ripple Effect”, which appears on its face to be completely unreasonable, since it was alleged to be the content of that DVD that is responsible for the extradition request. For all the judges knew, the DVD could have been a Beatles’ concert or completely blank.
Go to link to hear audio..
http://mtrial.org/inthemedia/131110-court-complicit-77-coverup-%E2%80%94-muaddib-extradition-approved-irelands-highest-court
http://noliesradio.org/archives/25176
In a stunning development, Ireland’s highest court ruled in favor of the extradition of Muad’Dib, who produced “7/7 Ripple Effect”, to England to stand trial for attempting to corrupt the judicial system.
The charge is in fact quite absurd, since Muad’Dib simply sent copies of his DVD to the court in England in an attempt to preclude the miscarriage of justice that would be involved in sentencing friends of the alleged “bombers” for their complicity in the matter, which is completely unjustified, once one becomes aware of the apparent governmental complicity in staging the 7/7 attacks.
The court addressed only three of some fifty-six points Muad’Dib had made in his own defense while ignoring the remainder.
According to a friend of Muad’Dib, Rob, who was present at the hearing, they used tortured logic and distorted language to justify their otherwise grossly improper verdict. The judges did not even bother to view “7/7 Ripple Effect”, which appears on its face to be completely unreasonable, since it was alleged to be the content of that DVD that is responsible for the extradition request. For all the judges knew, the DVD could have been a Beatles’ concert or completely blank.
Rob called me from Ireland today and we recorded two 25-30 minute segments about this travesty.
Go to link to hear audio..
http://mtrial.org/inthemedia/131110-court-complicit-77-coverup-%E2%80%94-muaddib-extradition-approved-irelands-highest-court
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT : Ruling...
Today, the judges ruled in favour of Muad'Dib's extradition, completely ignoring the majority of the Submissions He had written, and completely misrepresented or disregarded some of those they did address in their verdict. Instead of admitting the many instances where the judge in the previous trial had acted unlawfully, they took after his example and added their crimes to his. The film in question, 7/7 Ripple Effect, was not watched by these judges either. The Irish judicial (so-called) system has sold out to the U.K. Muad'Dib was taken to the gardai station and will then be transferred to prison awaiting the extradition. A more extensive report will appear shortly."
http://mtrial.org/news/111110-111110-ruling
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT : The Last Minutes of Hasib Hussain
created 09.11.2010 - 16:11, updated 18.01.2011 - 17:29
By Andrew S. MacGregor,
It is a privilege to post this article offered by Andrew MacGregor, a retired Australian policeman, on this site.
For nearly an hour after his three fellow bombers detonated their explosives on the tube, the teenager was seen pacing around outside King’s Cross, clearly unsure about what to do.Now this is odd.
The inquest has already been informed that these men actually made a ‘dummy run’ prior to the 7th of July 2005, and if this was the case, then Hasib Hussain would have been well aware of what he had to do and when to do it.
Please understand this point.
If what the inquest has already been informed of, that is that the four men accused of being terrorist bombers, had made ‘dummy runs prior to the actual attack, then Hasib Hussain would have been very well aware of what he was required to do, and his actions would not have been; ‘clearly unsure about what to do’.
He frantically rang his co-conspirators, only to find he couldn’t get through.
Continued click here for more....
Sunday, February 27, 2011
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT: Story remains intact
created 17.10.2010 - 10:35, updated 18.10.2010 - 07:43
Ripple Effect Story Remains IntactDear Muad'Dib,I've been going to the 7/7 Inquest. It seems to me that corroboration of the basic Ripple thesis is taking place! Here is something I have written....(might want to put it on your website?)yours truly, Nicholas
by Nicholas Kollerstrom
I've been rather sceptical over whether the Four really were in London that morning.
But, on the afternoon of Thursday 13th October, all of the CCTV showing Hasib Hussein at King's Cross was shown at the Inquest.
There was a lot.
Its clear that he was really there - I was convinced at last. From 8.55 to 9.22 he was shown pottering about with his big rucksack.
I suggest this makes it unlikely that the Four had caught the 07.25 train from Luton, arriving at 8.23 - in that case he would have appeared on film a lot earlier. No, Let's say they got the 7.42 (actually the delayed 7.30) which arrived in King's Cross 8.39 - that would fit better with his appearance on the CCTV at 8.55 in the main King's Cross station area.
It gets better.
On the day before the Wednesday the Met at last released their non-pixellated images of entry into Luton station, so the times could be read. On the earlier visit of 28 June, (three of them - no Hasib Hussein) it took five minutes from the car-park door of Luton through the station and down onto the platform - which seems about right:
28/6 08.10.07 Enter Luton, 08.14.26 Go through barriers, 08.15.07 Enter platform
Various people have tried doing this, and generally reached a similar estimate. Now, on the moring of 7/7, we are given
7/7 07.21.54 Enter Luton, 07.22.29 Ticket hall, 07.22.43 Go through barriers, 07.23.27 On platform, 07.24.47 Train arrives, 07.24.56 Board, 07.25.36 Train leaves
7.22 they enter, and a minute and a half later they are on the platform. No way!
They cannot take only half the time carrying big, deadly rucksacks. Don't forget, for a whole year all the media and the Met were singing from the same hymn-sheet, all saying that they had gotten onto the 7.40. Don't forget, even Andy Hayman's 2009 book on the whole subject had still said they got the 7.40 - this would be unthinkable if they really had had all of the CCTV they are now pretending to have, showing the Four caught the 7.25. (Credit to Bridget Dunne for this vitally important insight)
Plus, they are now pretending to have witnesses on the 7.25 train who noticed them - just as in the 2006 Official Report they had witnesses on the 7.40 train who recognised them. It's baloney.
I suggest we are obliged to conclude, that if they really did enter Luton station at 7.22, as the famous (fiddled-with) picture shows, then they had absolutely no intention of catching the 7.24.
So, this takes us right into the Ripple Effect story, whereby the Four 'missed their train' or at any rate more or less caught the 7.40 they had intended to catch (the 7.42, arriving 8.39), and arrived too late to participate in the terror-drill that morning - which was what they came for.
That I suggest is the only story now left standing.
From: "Muad'Dib" <Muad-Dib@JforJustice.co.uk>
Date: Sat, October 16, 2010 1:07 pm
To: "Nicholas Kollerstrom" <nkastro3@gmail.com>
Dear Nicholas,Bless you!I hope this finds you well, in good spirit and having a god day.Thank you very much for your message, commitment to truth, dedication and perseverance.I'm as certain as I can be, without having been involved in the planning, that what I put in 7/7 Riple Effect is exactly what happened and that is why they had to react to it and couldn't just ignore it like they normally do.I have them bang to rights and THEY know it, which is why THEY are attacking me to try to make an example of me to shut others up, as they KNOW they can't shut me up.I will most certainly send it to "Friends of Muad'Dib" for them to put it up there. Please keep up the good work. We will win in the end as long as we stick at it and together.I hope you have a good and well-deserved weekend.Long live the Fighters (for God/good),
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT Supreme Court Hearing
11.11.10 Supreme Court Hearing
created 15.09.2010 - 08:46, updated 04.11.2010 - 19:19
A date for the Irish Supreme Court to hear His appeal against the extradition has now been set for the 11th November 2010.
For Thursday, 11th November 2010
Mrs. Justice Macken
Mr. Justice Finnegan
Mr. Justice
(In the Hugh Kennedy Courtroom)
At 11 o'clock
For Hearing
143/09 MJELR v Hill
(source: supremecourt.ie)
Address: 8 Merchant's Quay, Dublin 8, Ireland
Muad'Dib's Submissions of the Appellant
For Thursday, 11th November 2010
Mrs. Justice Macken
Mr. Justice Finnegan
Mr. Justice
(In the Hugh Kennedy Courtroom)
At 11 o'clock
For Hearing
143/09 MJELR v Hill
(source: supremecourt.ie)
Address: 8 Merchant's Quay, Dublin 8, Ireland
Muad'Dib's Submissions of the Appellant
7/7 RIPPLE EFFECT :Muad'Dib's Submissions of the Appellant
http://mtrial.org/submissions... read more..
Please note: this page is a HTML conversion of the original Word Document available here and does not yet look identical to the original document. The conversion is work in progress. This is version 0.8. You can also read it on Scribd.
The first thing that needs to be clarified is that the Appellant does not submit to any Earthly jurisdiction, and has had to use the terminology “Submissions of the Appellant” because it is the recognized standard form and there is no other way to bring these supremely important matters to the attention of the Irish Nation, officially, on the record, except via their representatives in the Supreme Court of Ireland.
Please note: this page is a HTML conversion of the original Word Document available here and does not yet look identical to the original document. The conversion is work in progress. This is version 0.8. You can also read it on Scribd.
THE SUPREME COURT | No. 143/09 | |
| IN THE MATTER OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT ACT 2003 | ||
| Between/ | ||
THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE, EQUALITY AND LAW REFORM | ||
| Applicant Respondent | ||
-V- | ||
| Anthony John Hill | ||
Respondent Appellant | ||
SUBMISSIONS OF THE APPELLANT | ||
The first thing that needs to be clarified is that the Appellant does not submit to any Earthly jurisdiction, and has had to use the terminology “Submissions of the Appellant” because it is the recognized standard form and there is no other way to bring these supremely important matters to the attention of the Irish Nation, officially, on the record, except via their representatives in the Supreme Court of Ireland.
- On 2nd day of April 2009 the High Court (Peart J.) ordered the surrender of the Appellant to the United Kingdom on foot of an European arrest warrant to facilitate his prosecution for an offence described in the warrant as “doing an act tending and intended to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law.”Background
- Two packages each containing DVDs entitled “7/7 Ripple Effect” and featuring widely available video-footage were sent to Kingston Crown Court in Surrey, England. One package containing 5 DVDs (delivered on 13th May 2008) was addressed to the foreman of the Jury and the other containing one DVD (delivered on 10th June 2008) was addressed to the presiding trial Judge. The EAW states that the DVD drew heavily from a BBC Panorama programme entitled “London under Attack” which sought to put London anti-terror plans to test and the thrust of the video is that the UK government and security forces conspired to cause explosions in Central London on 7th July 2005 and the alleged 7/7 bombers were innocent individuals duped into participating in what they thought was a training exercise.
- The packages which were posted in the Republic of Ireland were delivered by standard mail but did not reach the addressees as they were received and “intercepted” by court staff who informed the police. The subsequent police investigation indicated that the handwriting on the DVDs and the envelopes was that of the Appellant. The Affidavit of the arresting Garda Sergeant avers that the Applicant conceded that he had sent the DVDs because he believed the alleged 7/7 bombers were innocent.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)